“The Australian Constitutional Act (UK) creating an international scandal.” R v Bailiff 2011 "It has been repealed."

“The Australian Constitutional Act (UK) creating an international scandal.”  

R v Bailiff 2011 "It has been repealed."

Vol H of R 69 pages 427-491 reveal; presenting petitions,  Kangaroos 4, Social Services 3 and Repatriation 1; questions on immigration, television, Gazelle Peninsula - evictions, industry stoppage 3, Empress of Australia, aboriginal child, wool industry, health, Vietnam, water, trade practices, defence conditions of service, shipping; discussion, Vietnam and Indo-China, tariff proposals, tariff board; reading, Book Bounty Bill 1970, Broadcasting and Television Bill 1970 before a House of Representatives sitting suspended at 5:54pm Tuesday 25th August 1970.

Nine minutes later, in 7 @  132 Grattan Street Carlton, I induced labour eight weeks premature.

At 1 hour and 57 minutes, Gough Whitlam, Member for Werriwa, Leader of the Opposition, is speaking, violating the convention or threatening to block supply of the Appropriation Bill.

At 3 hours 31 minutes, Frank Crean, Member for Melbourne Ports or where I was conceived.

At 1 year 347 days, Anthony Frank Mason was just appointed to the High Court of Australia.

At 1 year 347 days, until 5 years 78 days Anthony Frank Mason learned enough to advise John Kerr.

At 5 years 78 days, a Governor-General John Kerr, dismissed Prime Minister Gough Whitlam.

I Amicus Curae HRH Alexander Marcel André Sebastian Bailiff CIA FBI KGB Ph. D. Laws (HC)(ANU) have "the most extraordinary, uncompromising and uncontrolled mind." I, "have special talents." "A rare exception as he is [I'm] extremely intelligent." I'm "the greatest untapped resource." "I [John Filler 61 2 6288 5990] have an IQ of 150, so you have an IQ of at least 150.","Contrary to common belief, the world is becoming a better place. The challenge is to make it fairer." "And I just want to play Scrabble® and have a Monopoly® on global justice, equity and truth."

In ANU O-Week 1992, I founded The ANU Scrabble®  Society.  On the 2nd of March The ANU Debating Society printed a document, defaming  me and The ANU Scrabble® Society. On the 19th of March in Melville Hall, Debating Society , Vice President - Kath Cummins, Treasurer - Tim Hughes, Editor - Kirsten Edward’s, Editor - Matthew Sag and others viciously pointed out the defamatory document referred to me and The A.N.U. Scrabble® Society. On the 20th of March I asked President -Simon Brettel and Editor - Matthew Sag  why the Debating Society deliberately defamed me. I was told that it was a joke. I said,  I want the Debating Society to treat it like a joke when I send a copy of the defamatory document and a letter to:-

      1.   The Chief Justice of the High Court - Sir Anthony Mason, who may think it a great                    joke however, he may not want to be patron of an organisation, who show a blatant               disregard to the law. (Defamation Act)(Disability Discrimination Act)(Crimes Act)

      2.   My mother and stepfather, Christine and Philip Bates in Sydney, both in law, who would, think it such a great joke, they would inevitably mention it to a friend who is a High Court  Justice.

      3.   A friend of mine,  who is an adviser to the PM, who I work for, who would think it such a great  joke, he would inevitably mention it to a commission colleague, who is  a High Court Justice. 

I also touched on the notion of asking the makers of Scrabble® to also write a letter to the Chief  Justice. I said,  I would normally do what I had outlined, but I would be prepared to forget the entire matter  if:-

1.           I got a published apology.       

2.           I got a written apology and      

3.       the behaviour stopped immediately. 

The A.N.U. Debating Society, have a history of defaming people, as it counteracts the many insecurities of the executive and committee and members. The Debating Society  executive and committee,  knew the assistant sponsorship officer - Rachel Michelle Piercey, then 19, was vulnerable, emotionally  very insecure and would do anything to just get peer group acceptance.  The Debating Society, conspired to incite, urge, aid and encourage Piercey to commit an offence (s.348 s.349), in order to prevent me from pursuing the action I outlined, which would jeopardise the Chief Justice of the High Court, from being their patron. Whilst, this conspiracy was evolving, the defamation intensified.  And second defamatory document surfaced, Timothy, to be published in student association newspaper. And on the 26th of May I told the President - Simon Brettel I had no choice but to take the action, I had proposed.

The A.N.U. Debating Society, assistant sponsorship officer - Rachel Michelle Piercey had delicately been and sufficiently incited and encouraged, aided and abetted to make 7 untrue representations (s.134). Within 1 hour, she made 7 untrue representations to the Committee Against Sexual Harassment, known as the C.A.S.H., in return for her peer group acceptance.

1. I looked at her.            2. I sat in her seat in the lecture theatre.       3. I sat in her seat in the lecture theatre.  4. I sat in her seat, and when she  asked me to move I refused. (theatre has 400 seats).    5.         I swore at her.     6.         I swore at her.     7.         I followed her. 

When I met with Harry Geddes, from the Committee Against Sexual Harrassment (C.A.S.H.) and A.N.U. Law faculty, I explained what had been happening and what I proposed doing. Harry Geddes, told me, I was the one being harassed, and if I took the steps proposed it would cause considerable embarrassment to the A.N.U. and not to worry as he was investigating an unofficial complaint. Peter Bailey is the head of C.A.S.H., he and  ANU Faculty of Law advised. 

The purpose of complaints to C.A.S.H., was to impede me from pursuing the action I outlined.

Richard Refshauge advised from 3rd April 92. On the 16th of July, Ian Anderson, the General Manager of Murfett Regency, the maker of Scrabble® agreed to write a letter to Sir Anthony Mason, regarding the defamation. On the 20th of July I told Simon Brettel the good news. The same night, Piercey fabricated evidence, found in her room telling her to go to the Police station. So she went and saw her friend, fellow student and lover Const Harry Thomas Hains, fortunately I was not home that night. But on 22nd July, Hains arrested me, at 8:24pm, for a false accusation of threat to kill (s.30, s.344). On the 23rd July Rachel Piercey got an Interim Restraining Order (IRO) on that basis, a friend and solicitor Gavin Lee assisted. On the 28th July Piercey gave ANU Pro - Vice Chancellor Philip Alan Selth,  some fabricated evidence providing reasons why the ANU should hire a lawyer. ANU legal officer, Ann Featherstone, wrote Philip Selth a letter. Richard Refshauge (Macphillamy, Cummins and Gibson [now Deacons Graham James] and on ANU Committee with Philip Selth), got an a 2nd IRO for Piercey.  On the 31st July I was arrested by Constable  Rebecca McNevin,  for the 1st false accusation of breach of IRO, and the 2nd false breach on the 17th August. Again by Constable Hains, for the third false breach on the 22nd August, and the 4th false breach on the 8th September. I was convicted for all four breaches, despite having numerous alibis. (C.T.150992).

I was remanded from 8th September, until 16th October or 2 days after Sir Anthony Mason had dinner with the Debating Society. During sentence, on 16th October, Const Hains was cross examined about Piercey’s false accusation of 21st September and attempted arrest on same night, whilst I was in Woden Valley Hospital. Hains admitted he rang the Hospital to find out what access I had to the phone, and then rang Piercey and informed her of my whereabouts and what access I had to the phone. Harry Hains admitted “it was beyond his duty” and that “he went beyond his duty because he had a special interest”(C.T. 171092, 051192).

On 28th of July ‘93, Justice John Gallop in the Supreme Court acquitted me of all convictions, on the basis that the way they had been conducted in the Magistrates Court entirely defeated the principles of our legal system.  The next two false accusations made by Piercey, were dismissed, by the Magistrates. I delivered over 100 subpoenas for students and Rachel Michelle Piercey made a false accusation Tjarda Strienstra threatened to kill her. Dt Const Mick Pearce, did tell Tjarda Strienstra, he believed Piercey was responsible and requested that Tjarda Strienstra not tell me. ANU Philip Selth and Richard Refshuage threaten to sue me for defamation, and have me arrested on a regular basis. I have been arrested 70+ times and charged 70+. (Still no convictions on record!) Even thrice for trespass whilst reading in the library. On the 23rd December ‘93, 5 lawyers for the ANU got a restraining order against unrepresented me.  My 1994 General Services Fee was paid at 16:19 on 19-1-94, but I am not allowed on campus until I win my Supreme Court Appeal. I look forward to only the First  Australian National University International Fellowship and Honourary Doctorate in Laws.

Prediction of 1 month, 3 days, before I was hit by a car on a footpath, only dislocated my left collarbone. I receive death threats on a regular basis. In 1995, The A.N.U. Debating Society incited and encouraged Piercey to fabricate evidence, make a false accusation, and commit perjury, I was arrested in the High Court on the 10th May 1995. I was recorded on video being bashed by police that night. I only predicted these criminal events taking place in a Writ's of Mandamus and Negligence lodged against the Patron of The A.N.U. Debating Society and Chief Justice of the High Court on the 3rd January 1995; some 149 days before the events. I even wrote a letter to the Chief Justice, again predicting these crimes on the 10th May 1995. This was faxed to the Australian Federal Police Commissioner at 4.00am on the 10th May 1995, 7 hours before Piercey told the Magistrates Court I threatened to kill her, whilst holding a gun at her head. And 6 months later Philip Selth also made a false accusation of threat to kill.

The pattern of behaviour I isolated in 1992, 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996 is an international scandal due to: 1. inciting and encouraging 2. aiding and abetting 3. fabricate evidence 4. make false accusations 5. commit perjury 6. commit perjury with intent. 7. perverting course of justice.

I was not killed in 14th August 1999 arson and Rupert Murdoch manages global media rights.

Poetically, Richard Refshauge asked me if I would like to cut a deal, I replied I don't cut deals.

Do Sir Anthony Mason, Wilf Barker, Phil Ruthven, Kate Bush, Jeff Brown or Gough Whitlam?